Filed under: Western Europe | Tags: british, debt, iceland, icesave, imf, netherlands
Are you a banker? Do you believe predatory international loans are sacrosanct and above reproach? Does the thought of national economic sovereignty and independence make you shudder in terror?– If you answered “no” to these questions, then today can be counted as a victory for you.
Congratulations to the Icelandic peoples in rejecting outrageous preconditions from London and the Hague. This is a precedent to all nations under control of international debts. Go for moratorium!
Sky News:Iceland Rejects Icesave Bank Payback Plan
Icelanders have rejected a plan to pay back the British Government for money it lost over the collapse of the Icesave bank in 2008.
Over 93% percent of voters cast ballots opposing the £3.5bn deal to compensate the British and the Dutch state, initial results showed.
Both nations reimbursed citizens who lost money when Landsbanki and its internet banking scheme Icesave folded.
“This result is no surprise,” Prime Minister Johanna Sigurdardottir said.
“Now we must turn to the task of finishing the negotiations on Icesave.”
The propsed deal would require each person to pay around £90 a month for eight years, and many Icelandic taxpayers say they cannot afford it.
However, the rejection of the deal could jeopardise Iceland’s credit ratings, making it harder to access much-needed funding to fuel an economic recovery.
The island is grappling with a 9% unemployment rate, a 7% annual inflation rate and an economy that is still shrinking.
It was unclear how many of the 230,000 registered voters cast a ballot, but public television reported a turnout rate of around 55% an hour before polls closed.
Meanwhile, around 1,000 protesters gathered in downtown Reykjavik to demand a better say over the plans.
Last-minute talks broke down this week, despite Britain and the UK saying they had offered more favourable terms, including a significant cut on the interest rate in the original deal.
Despite stalled talks and the rejection in the referendum, Iceland’s government said it still believed it could strike a deal.
“The government of Iceland is confident that a solution acceptable to all parties can be achieved,” it said in a statement.
Filed under: Middle East, Russia / Caucacus, War, Western Europe | Tags: czech, missile, obama, poland, putin, shield
The moving of the Polish missile shield is little more than a desperate attempt to gladhand the Russians into supporting new sanctions and contiuned actions against Iran’s nuclear program. While this statement has been met with the utopian promises of a ‘reset’ in U.S relations with the Russian Federation, the bases will still remain, “streamlined”, and will still have offensive capabilites aimed at deterring the Russians. Also of note, in this compromise Putin has reverted U.S policy back to missile sheild discussions of 2007, and seems to have reached a tentative agreement to place them in a joint radar station in Azerbijian.
It seems unlikely that even with these concessions the U.S will be able to force Russia away from cooperation with the Iranian nuclear program as FM Lavrov has stated that the Russian position has not changed regarding Iran. In the meantime, many Russian thinkers view these developments correctly, as a shallow and transparent political maneuver designed to illicit cooperation on issues that the U.S can no longer handle alone.
U.S. Redeploys Missile Shield: The Geopolitical Encirclment of Russia
Global Research / Rick Rozoff
U.S. Missile Shield Plans: Retreat Or Advance?
Global Research / Rick Rozoff
Raytheon, Lockheed May Win in Obama Missile Plan
Bloomberg
New US anti-missile system in Israel, Azerbaijan to replace scrapped shield in E. Europe
DEBKA File
2007 FLASHBACK: Put missile shield in Azerbaijan, Russia tells US
Duty Now For The Future 