Duty Now For The Future


The Convenience of Preemptive Preparedness for the U.S military in Haiti
January 23, 2010, 2:41 am
Filed under: Latin America | Tags: , , , , , ,

It just so happened that SOUTHCOM was conducting a drill involving assisting Haiti in the aftermath of a hurricane the day before the first earthquake hit the island nation. It was at this point that U.S commanders decided to take the drill “live”. Thank god for the U.S military and its uncanny ability to predict disasters in the days before they occur.

Michel Chossudovsky: A Haiti Disaster Relief Scenario Was Envisaged by the US Military One Day Before the Earthquake

A Haiti disaster relief scenario had been envisaged at the headquarters of US Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) in Miami one day prior to the earthquake.

The holding of pre-disaster simulations pertained to the impacts of a hurricane in Haiti. They were held on January 11. (Bob Brewin,  Defense launches online system to coordinate Haiti relief efforts (1/15/10) — GovExec.com, complete text of article is contained in Annex)

The Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA), which is under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense (DoD), was involved in organizing these scenarios on behalf of US Southern Command.(SOUTHCOM).

Defined as a “Combat Support Agency”, DISA has a mandate to provide IT and telecommunications, systems, logistics services in support of the US military. (See DISA website: Defense Information Systems Agency).

On the day prior to the earthquake, “on Monday [January 11, 2010], Jean Demay, DISA’s technical manager for the agency’s Transnational Information Sharing Cooperation project, happened to be at the headquarters of the U.S. Southern Command in Miami preparing for a test of the system in a scenario that involved providing relief to Haiti in the wake of a hurricane.” (Bob Brewin, op cit, emphasis added) Continue reading



Occupied Haiti
January 23, 2010, 2:26 am
Filed under: Latin America | Tags: , , , , , ,

After successfully gaining control of the Port-au-Prince airport, the goals for U.S military engagement have focused on domestic policing and ensuring the freedom of movement for American forces and equipment. These objectives are being accomplished with resolute action, while the real issue of Haitian humanitarian needs are being grossly overlooked and (purposely?) hampered.

The main pipeline for relief services and aid Haiti in the aftermath of several earthquakes has been completely disabled as American military officials are refusing to allow vital medical necessities to land in the country, claiming that flights with “known” cargo are being given preferential treatment. Obviously at this point, “known” cargo is that which originates from the U.S military. Worse, equipment which is being allowed to land is being distributed so ineffectively and slow that its impact is woefully inadequate to ensure an increased survival rate. Deaths from gangrene, starvation and malnutrition are increasing dramatically due to this incompetence/malfeasance. Workers and volunteers from other nations (Iceland, Cuba, D. Republic) are assisting with no military escort and limited resources and seem to be having more effect then the remarkably militaristic disposition of the U.S


Global Research: US military blocks relief efforts in Haiti

2009-01-19; Doctors Without Borders: Doctors Without Borders Plane with Lifesaving Medical Supplies Diverted Again from Landing in Haiti
An MSF cargo plane carrying 12 tons of lifesaving medical supplies has been turned away three times from Port-au-Prince airport since Sunday night, despite assurances of its ability to land.

2009-01-17; Doctors Without Borders: Doctors Without Borders Cargo Plane With Full Hospital and Staff Blocked From Landing in Port-au-Prince

Democracy Now!: Bottled Water Supplies in Port-au-Prince Airport Being Distributed…to US Embassy



Haiti: Military Response to Humanitarian Issues
January 20, 2010, 1:30 am
Filed under: Latin America | Tags: , , , , , , , ,

We’re back. OK. The tragic situation in Haiti has brought the plight of one of the poorest nations in the Western Hemisphere to the forefront of international media concern. Resulting events are are likely to produce an outwardly egalitarian motivation for assisting the millions of indigent and homeless in the wake of these events– with the U.S government attempting to take the lead in post-disaster relief. However, while doctors, construction equipment, triage kits, and basic supplies are desperately needed as chaos begins to hit the streets, the U.S seems intent of fulfilling military and strategic objectives long before tangible assistance can be observed. The logjam of military equipment at the Port-au-Prince airport, military surveillance aircraft, CIA operatives and photo-ops for Obama highlight U.S response to a purely humanitarian objective. This clearly signals the DOD and its intentions to expand their presence into Latin America to be used as a base of operations against non-cooperative leaders and a strategic area for military deployment to Africa and the Antarctic– demonstrated by Chavez and Morales at the ALBA meeting some months ago. This could be the new American bulwark in the Caribbean.

U.S military equipment waiting to be deployed in Port-au-Prince

Global Research: The Militarization of Emergency Aid to Haiti: Is it a Humanitarian Operation or an Invasion?

Online Journal: U.S. troops in Haiti to prevent Aristide’s return



Is war imminent in Colombia? Chavez tells troops to prepare
November 10, 2009, 1:29 am
Filed under: Latin America, War | Tags: , , , , , ,

While the media spins this story into another tale of irrational Venezuelan bluster, quietly preparations are beginning for a potential conflict in Latin America. Will this be a limited conflict between Venezuela and Colombia, or will the U.S use its new found presence in the region as “an opportunity for conducting full spectrum operations throughout South America ?” The U.S military considers Palanquerno such an asset for potential military operations that in the Air Force Global en Route Strategy document, it is treated as a vital defense against “security and stability [that] is under constant threat from narcotics funded terrorist insurgencies…and anti-US governments.”


Obama and Uribe look deeply into each others eyes to reveal the appropriate military strategy.

BBC: Chavez steps up Colombia war talk

Eva Golinger: Official US Air Force Document Reveals the True Intentions Behind the US-Colombia Military Agreement

“…It’s not difficult to imagine which governments in South America are considered by Washington to be “anti-US governments”. The constant aggressive declarations and statements emitted by the State and Defense Departments and the US Congress against Venezuela and Bolivia, and even to some extent Ecuador, evidence that the ALBA nations are the ones perceived by Washington as a “constant threat”. To classify a country as “anti-US” is to consider it an enemy of the United States. In this context, it’s obvious that the military agreement with Colombia is a reaction to a region the US now considers full of “enemies”…”



Fidel Castro on Colombia situation
November 10, 2009, 1:05 am
Filed under: Latin America, War | Tags: , , , , , , ,

Fidel Castro: The Annexation of Colombia to the U.S

Anyone with some information can immediately see that the sweetened ‘Complementation Agreement for Defense and Security Cooperation and Technical Assistance between the Governments of Colombia and the United States’ signed on October 30, and made public in the evening of November 2, amounts to the annexation of Colombia to the United States.

The agreement puts theoreticians and politicians in a predicament. It wouldn’t be honest to keep silence now and speak later on sovereignty, democracy, human rights, freedom of opinion and other delights, when a country is being devoured by the empire as easy as lizards catch flies. This is the Colombian people; a self-sacrificing, industrious and combative people. I looked up in the hefty document for a digestible justification and I found none whatsoever.

Of 48 pages with 21 lines each, five are used to philosophize on the background of the shameful absorption that turns Colombia into an overseas territory. They are all based on the agreements signed with the United States after the murder of the distinguished progressive leader Jorge Eliecer Gaitan on April 9, 1948, and the establishment, on April 30, 1948, of the Organization of American States debated by the foreign ministers of the hemisphere meeting in Bogota, with the US as the boss, during the dramatic days when the Colombian oligarchy cut short the life of that leader thus paving the way to the onset of the armed struggle in that country.

The Agreement on Military Assistance between the Republic of Colombia and the United States of April 1952; the one related to Army, Naval and Air Missions from the US Forces, signed on October 7, 1974; the 1988 UN Convention against the Illegal Trafficking of Drugs and Psychotropic Substances; the 2000 UN Convention against Organized Transnational Delinquency; the 2001 Security Council Resolution 1373 and the Inter-American Democratic Charter; the Democratic Security and Defense Policy resolution and others referred to in the abovementioned document, none of them can justify turning a 713,592.5 square miles country located in the heart of South America into a US military base. Colombia’s territory is 1.6 times that of Texas, the second largest state of the Union taken away from Mexico and later used as a base to conquer with great violence more than half of that country.

On the other hand, over 59 years have passed since Colombian soldiers were sent to distant Asia, in October 1950, to fight alongside the Yankee troops against Chinese and Korean combatants. Now, the empire intends to send them to fight against their brothers in Venezuela,Ecuador and other Bolivarian and ALBA countries, to crush the Venezuelan Revolution as they tried to do with the Cuban Revolution in April 1961.

For more than one and a half year before the invasion of Cuba, the Yankee administration fostered, armed and used counterrevolutionary bandits in the Escambray the same way it is now using the Colombian paramilitary forces against Venezuela.

At the time of the Giron [Bay of Pigs] attack, the Yankee B-26 aircrafts piloted by mercenaries operated from Nicaragua. Their fighter planes were brought to the theater of operations in an aircraft carrier and the invaders of Cuban descent who landed in our territory were escorted by US warships and by the American marines. This time their war equipment and troops will be in Colombia posing a threat not only toVenezuela but to every country in Central and South America.

It is really cynical to claim that the infamous agreement is necessary to fight drug-trafficking and international terrorism. Cuba has shown that there is no need of foreign troops to prevent the cultivation and trafficking of drugs and to preserve domestic order, even though the United States –the mightiest power on Earth—has promoted, financed and armed the terrorists who for decades have attacked the Cuban Revolution.

The preservation of domestic peace is a basic prerogative of every government and the presence of Yankee troops in any Latin American country to do it on their behalf constitutes a blatant foreign interference in their internal affairs that will inevitably elicit the peoples’ rejection.

A simple reading of the document shows that not only the Colombian airbases will be in the Yankees’ hands but also the civilian airports and ultimately any facility that may be useful to their armed forces. The radio space is also available to that country with a different culture and other interests that have nothing in common with those of the Colombian people.

The US Armed Forces will have exceptional prerogatives.

The occupants can commit any crime anywhere in Colombia against Colombian families, property and laws and still be unaccountable to the country’s authorities. Actually, they have taken diseases and scandalous behavior to many places like the Palmerola military base inHonduras. In Cuba, when they came to visit the neo-colony, they sat astride the neck of Jose Marti’s statue, in the capital’s Central Park. The limit set with regards to the total number of soldiers can be modified as requested by the United States, and with no restriction whatsoever. The aircraft carriers and warships visiting the naval bases given to them can take as large a crew as they choose, and this can be thousands in only one of their large aircraft carriers.

The Agreement, which will remain in force for successive 10-year periods, can’t be modified until the end of every period, with a one-year prior notice. What will the United States do if an administration as that of Johnson, Nixon, Reagan, Bush sr. or Bush jr., and others like them, is asked to leave Colombia? The Yankees have ousted scores of governments in our hemisphere. How long would a government last in Colombiaif it announced such intentions?

Now, the politicians in Latin America are faced with a sensitive issue: the fundamental duty of explaining their viewpoints on the annexation document. I am aware that what is happening in Honduras at this decisive moment draws the attention of the media and the foreign ministers of this hemisphere, but the Latin American governments cannot overlook the extremely serious and transcendental events taking place in Colombia.

I have no doubts about the reaction of the peoples; they will be sensitive to the dagger being shoved deep inside them, especially inColombia: They will oppose! They will never cave in to such ignominy!

Today, the world is facing serious and pressing problems. The entire humanity is threatened by climate change. European leaders are almost begging on their knees for some kind of agreement in Copenhagen that will prevent the catastrophe. They practically concede that theSummit will fail to meet the objective of reaching an agreement that can drastically reduce the greenhouse gas emissions and promise to continue struggling to attain it before 2012; however, there is a true risk that an agreement cannot be reached until it is too late.

The Third World countries are rightly claiming from the richest and most developed nations hundreds of billion dollars a year to pay for the climate battle.

Does it make sense for the United States government to invest time and money in building military bases in Colombia to impose on our peoples their hateful tyranny? Along that path, if a disaster is already threatening the world, a greater and faster disaster is threatening the empire and it would all be the consequence of the same exploiting and plundering system of the planet.



Ecuador asks Russia for help on Colombia; Venezuela increases border presence
November 7, 2009, 3:54 am
Filed under: Latin America, Russia / Caucacus, War | Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Looks like the increased U.S presence in Colombia is causing South American nations, especially those involved in the ALBA contingency, to continue preparations for a potential U.S proxy-conflict. With Colombia, the U.S now has a visible military presence on every continent, a precedent which is not lost on Morales, Chavez, Correa and others, especially with the recent increase of violence of the northwest border of Venezuela.


Russian F.M Sergei Lavrov and Ecuador President Rafael Correa

Vedomosti: Ecuador Seeks Russian Aid Against U.S. Military Buildup In Colombia

Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa will come to Moscow to discuss weapons supplies, but the Kremlin also expects him to speak about the recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia.

“We need to restore the might of our army,” Correa said about the goal of his visit to Moscow, which he will make together with Defense Minister Javier Ponce.

Ecuador has been alarmed by the decision of Colombia, with which it severed diplomatic relations in March 2008, to allow U.S. troops to use its bases.

The Ecuadorian officials plan to sign the contract, which was initialed last week, for the delivery of two Mi-17 Hip multirole helicopters for its Defense Ministry’s civilian purposes, said a representative of the Russian state arms exporter, Rosoboronexport.

However, Moscow also expects Ecuador to sign other contracts. A source at Russian Technology said Russia could supply six Su-30MK2 Flanker multirole fighters, several helicopters, and air defense systems to Ecuador, which would increase the value of their military cooperation to over $200 million.

In response, Russia expects Ecuador to recognize the independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. A source at the Russian Foreign Ministry said Ecuador had unofficially promised to announce its intention during the president’s visit…

==========

Reuters: Venezuela arrests eight Colombian ‘paramilitaries’

Xinhua News: Venezuela Strengthens Military Presence On Colombian Border



Russia increases ties with Ecuador
October 28, 2009, 5:14 am
Filed under: Latin America, Russia / Caucacus | Tags: , , , , ,

Latin American countries are becoming more involved in military exchange with Russia as the ALBA alliance is drifting more conspicuously away from U.S/NATO influence. This includes not only military partnerships with Russia, but also the summary rejection of U.S presence in the region through military bases in Colombia.

Vedomosti: Ecuador Seeks Russian Aid Against U.S. Military Buildup In Colombia

October 27, 2009

Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa will come to Moscow to discuss weapons supplies, but the Kremlin also expects him to speak about the recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia.

“We need to restore the might of our army,” Correa said about the goal of his visit to Moscow, which he will make together with Defense Minister Javier Ponce.

Ecuador has been alarmed by the decision of Colombia, with which it severed diplomatic relations in March 2008, to allow U.S. troops to use its bases.

The Ecuadorian officials plan to sign the contract, which was initialed last week, for the delivery of two Mi-17 Hip multirole helicopters for its Defense Ministry’s civilian purposes, said a representative of the Russian state arms exporter, Rosoboronexport.

However, Moscow also expects Ecuador to sign other contracts. A source at Russian Technology said Russia could supply six Su-30MK2 Flanker multirole fighters, several helicopters, and air defense systems to Ecuador, which would increase the value of their military cooperation to over $200 million.

In response, Russia expects Ecuador to recognize the independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. A source at the Russian Foreign Ministry said Ecuador had unofficially promised to announce its intention during the president’s visit.

There are no indications that the decision has been taken, but we have strong hopes for recognition by Ecuador and Bolivia, said South Ossetian Foreign Minister Murat Dzhioyev.

Positive signals are coming from all Latin American countries, said Maxim Gvindzhia, deputy foreign minister of Abkhazia. “Following recognition by Nicaragua and Venezuela, the other ALBA countries will eventually recognize us too,” he said.

The Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America (ALBA) is an international cooperation organization comprising Venezuela, Cuba, Bolivia, Nicaragua, Ecuador, the Dominican Republic, Honduras, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, and Antigua and Barbuda.

Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega announced the recognition of the two breakaway Georgian republics in September 2008, and in December Russia granted Nicaragua a $1 billion loan.

Venezuela was issued a $2.2 billion loan for the purchase of Russian weapons during the visit by President Hugo Chavez in September this year, when he announced the recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia.

However, Gvindzhia recalled that a $1 billion loan had been granted to Venezuela in September 2008, when Chavez was in Moscow, but Venezuela did not recognize the two republics then.

———

RELATED ARTICLES:

Wall Street Journal: Ecuador President To Visit Russia To Strengthen Ties

GlobalSecurity.org: Russia, Ecuador strike deal on nuclear power cooperation

RIA Novosti: Ecuador to sign strategic partnership deal with Russia



The Belt of Conflict

The United States is continually expanding the presence of their forces to several points throughout the globe. The locations of these engagements form a “belt of conflict” which stretches the length of the globe. Now, the conflict in these areas is escalating to a point at which, some time in the future, the possibility of an international conflict with nuclear overtones can be seen. From military bases in Colombia, destabilization of Bolivia and Venezuela, funding and arming separatist groups in Africa, manufacturing humanitarian precepts for Sudanese involvement, the continuing conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, NATO expansion in Eastern Europe, strategic maneuvering in the Caspian basin, attempts to gain control of the “string of pearls” and the escalating competition over Arctic resources– the U.S is pursuing a policy of confrontation for the sole purpose of gaining access to natural resources, subverting potential international coalitions and securing freedom of international military deployment.

RIA Novosti: U.S. could deploy missile shield in Arctic – Russia’s NATO envoy

Ice News: US could launch missiles from the Baltic Sea

GeoPoliticalMonitor.com: U.S weapons end up in al-Qaeda hands

Telegraph: NATO commander warns of conflict with Russia in the Arctic Circle

Rick Rozoff: U.S., NATO Poised For Most Massive War In Afghanistan’s History



Latin American leaders speak out against US-Colombia bases
September 22, 2009, 9:34 am
Filed under: Latin America

At the recent UNASUR meeting, Hugo Chavez and Evo Morales lashed out at the U.S-Colombian joint military bases as a possible staging ground for future U.S deployments inside Latin America. During the meeting Chavez read excerpts from a document entitled, “Global En Route Strategy” from the U.S Air Mobility Command, which details USSOUTHCOM goals in the region. These include: “helping achieve the regional engagement strategy and assists with the mobility routing to Africa.”  These goals fit in with the overall DOD doctrine of ‘full spectrum dominance’ highlighted in the National Defense Review which identitfies the goal of U.S military operations as “access to the global commons and natural resources”. In this instance, access to Latin America offers the U.S access to soverign land and natural resources, the command of politcal influence, corporate enrichment through continued degradation of all kinds as well as potential points of accessibility into the African continent. Chavez has called on President Lula de Silva of Brazil to mediate discussions over the proposed military bases with President Obama.

Morales: U.S planning coups in Latin America
Press TV

South American Nations Question U.S.-Colombia Military Base Agreement
CIP Americas

US Air Mobility Command: Global en Route Strategy



Chavez “Anti-Yankee” politics
September 13, 2009, 6:58 am
Filed under: Latin America, Resource Wars, Russia / Caucacus | Tags: , , , ,

With the independent streaks currently being displayed by some South American leaders, the most prevalent being Chavez, it’s not too hard to figure out why they have been targets of U.S-backed coup attempts. Now with the “soft power” doctrine infesting U.S military operations expect western intelligence to carry out regional de-stabilization through their proxies in Colombia (and now, Honduras) and the FARC narco-terrorists.
Chavez is also reaching out to the Russians– his recognition of South Ossetia and Abkhazia is a huge diplomatic outreach, as only Nicaraqua has officially recognized these territories previously.

Chavez asks Spain to mediate in Colombia relations
Earth Times

Venezuela accuses Colombia of facilitating US control of Latin America by permitting Washington to install new military bases on its territory…

===============

Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez recognizes breakaway Georgia republics
L.A Times

“We recognize both republics starting from today,” Chavez said during a meeting at the residence of Russian President Dmitry Medvedev. The Russian leader thanked Chavez enthusiastically, and promptly pledged to sell tanks and other weapons to Venezuela.

“There will be tanks among the deliveries [of armaments]. Why not?” said the Russian president. “We have good tanks. If our friends order them, we will deliver.”