Duty Now For The Future


The Convenience of Preemptive Preparedness for the U.S military in Haiti
January 23, 2010, 2:41 am
Filed under: Latin America | Tags: , , , , , ,

It just so happened that SOUTHCOM was conducting a drill involving assisting Haiti in the aftermath of a hurricane the day before the first earthquake hit the island nation. It was at this point that U.S commanders decided to take the drill “live”. Thank god for the U.S military and its uncanny ability to predict disasters in the days before they occur.

Michel Chossudovsky: A Haiti Disaster Relief Scenario Was Envisaged by the US Military One Day Before the Earthquake

A Haiti disaster relief scenario had been envisaged at the headquarters of US Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) in Miami one day prior to the earthquake.

The holding of pre-disaster simulations pertained to the impacts of a hurricane in Haiti. They were held on January 11. (Bob Brewin,  Defense launches online system to coordinate Haiti relief efforts (1/15/10) — GovExec.com, complete text of article is contained in Annex)

The Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA), which is under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense (DoD), was involved in organizing these scenarios on behalf of US Southern Command.(SOUTHCOM).

Defined as a “Combat Support Agency”, DISA has a mandate to provide IT and telecommunications, systems, logistics services in support of the US military. (See DISA website: Defense Information Systems Agency).

On the day prior to the earthquake, “on Monday [January 11, 2010], Jean Demay, DISA’s technical manager for the agency’s Transnational Information Sharing Cooperation project, happened to be at the headquarters of the U.S. Southern Command in Miami preparing for a test of the system in a scenario that involved providing relief to Haiti in the wake of a hurricane.” (Bob Brewin, op cit, emphasis added) Continue reading



Occupied Haiti
January 23, 2010, 2:26 am
Filed under: Latin America | Tags: , , , , , ,

After successfully gaining control of the Port-au-Prince airport, the goals for U.S military engagement have focused on domestic policing and ensuring the freedom of movement for American forces and equipment. These objectives are being accomplished with resolute action, while the real issue of Haitian humanitarian needs are being grossly overlooked and (purposely?) hampered.

The main pipeline for relief services and aid Haiti in the aftermath of several earthquakes has been completely disabled as American military officials are refusing to allow vital medical necessities to land in the country, claiming that flights with “known” cargo are being given preferential treatment. Obviously at this point, “known” cargo is that which originates from the U.S military. Worse, equipment which is being allowed to land is being distributed so ineffectively and slow that its impact is woefully inadequate to ensure an increased survival rate. Deaths from gangrene, starvation and malnutrition are increasing dramatically due to this incompetence/malfeasance. Workers and volunteers from other nations (Iceland, Cuba, D. Republic) are assisting with no military escort and limited resources and seem to be having more effect then the remarkably militaristic disposition of the U.S


Global Research: US military blocks relief efforts in Haiti

2009-01-19; Doctors Without Borders: Doctors Without Borders Plane with Lifesaving Medical Supplies Diverted Again from Landing in Haiti
An MSF cargo plane carrying 12 tons of lifesaving medical supplies has been turned away three times from Port-au-Prince airport since Sunday night, despite assurances of its ability to land.

2009-01-17; Doctors Without Borders: Doctors Without Borders Cargo Plane With Full Hospital and Staff Blocked From Landing in Port-au-Prince

Democracy Now!: Bottled Water Supplies in Port-au-Prince Airport Being Distributed…to US Embassy



President Obama and the Rise of Japan’s Pacifists (Again!)
November 19, 2009, 4:18 am
Filed under: The Pacific, War | Tags: , , , , , ,


World News: President Obama and the Rise of Japan’s Pacifists (Again!)

With the recent election of Japan’s Prime Minister Yuko Hatoyama, President Barack Obama might have received a warmer welcome in Tokyo’s Suntory Hall by claiming to be America’s first Pacifist President, instead of America’s first Pacific President. Prime Minister Hatoyama, after all, has promised to halt its nations naval mission supporting the U.S.-led war in Afghanistan. He is also reviewing basing agreements and the stationing of 50,000 U.S. troops, including those in Okinawa. It is obvious, that America’s militarist tradition and imperial presidency-which Barack Obama inherited-is in stark contrast to the rise of Japan’s Pacifists, again! In fact, it might be a more important component to U.S.-Japan relations than that of trade and commerce…

…Could this be the reason President Obama warned Prime Minsiter Yuko Hatoyama, along with pacifists in his Democratic Party of Japan, of serious consequences if it reneges on its military realignment plans? North Korea’s nuclear weapons program, Taiwan’s movement towards autonomy, and the geopolitical importance of the Strait of Taiwan have only added to a strong U.S. military presence in the region. And with uncertainty over military bases in Okinawa-making it improbable for America to contain China and other nations in the area-U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates has notified Japan that relations may “fracture” and “lead to a standstill in the nation’s security policy…

==========
RELATED ARTICLES:

NY Times: On Obama’s Asia trip, not much adulation

NY Times: In Japan, Obama says US will study status of Okinawa base



U.S boosts India’s anti-terror efforts
November 19, 2009, 3:20 am
Filed under: China / SE Asia, War | Tags: , , , , ,

This short article seems to be revealing the parameters of the U.S-Indian relationship; using the “Pakistan issue”, the Mumbai bombing and other recent terrorist events as the fulcrum of the growing relationship which includes intelligence sharing, cooperative military drills, nuclear exchange and more.


Asia Times: US boosts India’s anti-terror efforts

…India has also increased its sharing of information and operational details with US intelligence agencies, such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Officials say this cooperation has gone a long way towards boosting domestic expertise. CIA director Leon E Panetta is due to visit India in November.

The close relationship of the US with Pakistan gives the Americans access to classified information that is valuable to India. Activities such as phone calls, meetings, travel, and e-mails by dozens of Pakistan-based LeT operatives are monitored by US agencies, information that that is now accessible to India.

One recent example highlights the benefits of India and the US sharing information…. Continue reading



Fidel Castro on Colombia situation
November 10, 2009, 1:05 am
Filed under: Latin America, War | Tags: , , , , , , ,

Fidel Castro: The Annexation of Colombia to the U.S

Anyone with some information can immediately see that the sweetened ‘Complementation Agreement for Defense and Security Cooperation and Technical Assistance between the Governments of Colombia and the United States’ signed on October 30, and made public in the evening of November 2, amounts to the annexation of Colombia to the United States.

The agreement puts theoreticians and politicians in a predicament. It wouldn’t be honest to keep silence now and speak later on sovereignty, democracy, human rights, freedom of opinion and other delights, when a country is being devoured by the empire as easy as lizards catch flies. This is the Colombian people; a self-sacrificing, industrious and combative people. I looked up in the hefty document for a digestible justification and I found none whatsoever.

Of 48 pages with 21 lines each, five are used to philosophize on the background of the shameful absorption that turns Colombia into an overseas territory. They are all based on the agreements signed with the United States after the murder of the distinguished progressive leader Jorge Eliecer Gaitan on April 9, 1948, and the establishment, on April 30, 1948, of the Organization of American States debated by the foreign ministers of the hemisphere meeting in Bogota, with the US as the boss, during the dramatic days when the Colombian oligarchy cut short the life of that leader thus paving the way to the onset of the armed struggle in that country.

The Agreement on Military Assistance between the Republic of Colombia and the United States of April 1952; the one related to Army, Naval and Air Missions from the US Forces, signed on October 7, 1974; the 1988 UN Convention against the Illegal Trafficking of Drugs and Psychotropic Substances; the 2000 UN Convention against Organized Transnational Delinquency; the 2001 Security Council Resolution 1373 and the Inter-American Democratic Charter; the Democratic Security and Defense Policy resolution and others referred to in the abovementioned document, none of them can justify turning a 713,592.5 square miles country located in the heart of South America into a US military base. Colombia’s territory is 1.6 times that of Texas, the second largest state of the Union taken away from Mexico and later used as a base to conquer with great violence more than half of that country.

On the other hand, over 59 years have passed since Colombian soldiers were sent to distant Asia, in October 1950, to fight alongside the Yankee troops against Chinese and Korean combatants. Now, the empire intends to send them to fight against their brothers in Venezuela,Ecuador and other Bolivarian and ALBA countries, to crush the Venezuelan Revolution as they tried to do with the Cuban Revolution in April 1961.

For more than one and a half year before the invasion of Cuba, the Yankee administration fostered, armed and used counterrevolutionary bandits in the Escambray the same way it is now using the Colombian paramilitary forces against Venezuela.

At the time of the Giron [Bay of Pigs] attack, the Yankee B-26 aircrafts piloted by mercenaries operated from Nicaragua. Their fighter planes were brought to the theater of operations in an aircraft carrier and the invaders of Cuban descent who landed in our territory were escorted by US warships and by the American marines. This time their war equipment and troops will be in Colombia posing a threat not only toVenezuela but to every country in Central and South America.

It is really cynical to claim that the infamous agreement is necessary to fight drug-trafficking and international terrorism. Cuba has shown that there is no need of foreign troops to prevent the cultivation and trafficking of drugs and to preserve domestic order, even though the United States –the mightiest power on Earth—has promoted, financed and armed the terrorists who for decades have attacked the Cuban Revolution.

The preservation of domestic peace is a basic prerogative of every government and the presence of Yankee troops in any Latin American country to do it on their behalf constitutes a blatant foreign interference in their internal affairs that will inevitably elicit the peoples’ rejection.

A simple reading of the document shows that not only the Colombian airbases will be in the Yankees’ hands but also the civilian airports and ultimately any facility that may be useful to their armed forces. The radio space is also available to that country with a different culture and other interests that have nothing in common with those of the Colombian people.

The US Armed Forces will have exceptional prerogatives.

The occupants can commit any crime anywhere in Colombia against Colombian families, property and laws and still be unaccountable to the country’s authorities. Actually, they have taken diseases and scandalous behavior to many places like the Palmerola military base inHonduras. In Cuba, when they came to visit the neo-colony, they sat astride the neck of Jose Marti’s statue, in the capital’s Central Park. The limit set with regards to the total number of soldiers can be modified as requested by the United States, and with no restriction whatsoever. The aircraft carriers and warships visiting the naval bases given to them can take as large a crew as they choose, and this can be thousands in only one of their large aircraft carriers.

The Agreement, which will remain in force for successive 10-year periods, can’t be modified until the end of every period, with a one-year prior notice. What will the United States do if an administration as that of Johnson, Nixon, Reagan, Bush sr. or Bush jr., and others like them, is asked to leave Colombia? The Yankees have ousted scores of governments in our hemisphere. How long would a government last in Colombiaif it announced such intentions?

Now, the politicians in Latin America are faced with a sensitive issue: the fundamental duty of explaining their viewpoints on the annexation document. I am aware that what is happening in Honduras at this decisive moment draws the attention of the media and the foreign ministers of this hemisphere, but the Latin American governments cannot overlook the extremely serious and transcendental events taking place in Colombia.

I have no doubts about the reaction of the peoples; they will be sensitive to the dagger being shoved deep inside them, especially inColombia: They will oppose! They will never cave in to such ignominy!

Today, the world is facing serious and pressing problems. The entire humanity is threatened by climate change. European leaders are almost begging on their knees for some kind of agreement in Copenhagen that will prevent the catastrophe. They practically concede that theSummit will fail to meet the objective of reaching an agreement that can drastically reduce the greenhouse gas emissions and promise to continue struggling to attain it before 2012; however, there is a true risk that an agreement cannot be reached until it is too late.

The Third World countries are rightly claiming from the richest and most developed nations hundreds of billion dollars a year to pay for the climate battle.

Does it make sense for the United States government to invest time and money in building military bases in Colombia to impose on our peoples their hateful tyranny? Along that path, if a disaster is already threatening the world, a greater and faster disaster is threatening the empire and it would all be the consequence of the same exploiting and plundering system of the planet.



Iran ‘not intimidated’ by sanctions
November 7, 2009, 4:17 am
Filed under: Middle East, War | Tags: , , ,

Press TV: Iran ‘not intimidated’ by sanctions

As Washington scrambles to assemble tougher sanctions against Tehran, a senior Iranian lawmaker assures that the country will never be ‘intimidated’ into giving up its nuclear rights.

In a speech commemorating the 30th anniversary of the US embassy takeover in Tehran, Gholam-Ali Haddad-Adel warned Washington against threatening the Iranians with sanctions.

“[The Islamic Republic] will not negotiate on its legitimate rights,” said the former speaker of the Iranian Parliament (Majlis).

His remarks come after US President Barack Obama urged the Tehran government to “decide whether it wants to focus on the past, or whether it will make the choices that will open the door to greater opportunity, prosperity and justice for its people.”

“I have made it clear that the United States of America wants to move beyond this past, and seeks a relationship with the Islamic Republic of Iran based upon mutual interests and mutual respect,” said the US President.

In Iran, Obama’s remarks were seen as a far cry from the oft-stated promises of ‘change’ he made while on the stump.

According to Haddad-Adel, the statements show that Obama’s promises of change were “mere slogans to help him rise to power.”

“What we have seen in the past ten months was just a change of tone in Washington, not a change of US policy,” said Haddad-Adel. “The real change should come in the US approach towards Muslim people and democracy.”

The Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei has also said that Washington’s stance on Iran has not changed in the least.

“The Islamic Republic of Iran decided from the very beginning to avoid presumption and instead take into consideration the slogan of ‘change’. But what we have witnessed in practice during this period of time has been in contradiction with the remarks that have been made,” Ayatollah Khamenei said.

Washington and a number of European powers have been trying hard in recent days to get Iran to sign an IAEA-drafted proposal on third-party nuclear fuel supply.

Under the plan, as much as 70 percent of Iran’s low-enriched uranium (LEU) would be sent abroad to be turned into fuel rods for medical use at the Tehran research reactor.

Powered by 20-percent enriched uranium, the Tehran research reactor produces isotopes for cancer care to more than 200 hospitals.

Iranian officials have welcomed foreign cooperation on fuel supply, but have rejected the idea of sending out the bulk of its stock in one batch.

===========
RELATED ARTICLE

Press TV: A year after, Obama’s Iran policy unchanged



U.S-Indo cooperative military drills increase
November 7, 2009, 4:13 am
Filed under: China / SE Asia, War | Tags: , , , ,

Indo-U.S cooperation in the form of military drills is increasing, and judging by the importance placed on them by U.S commanders, the military/intelligence community is perhaps envisioning a situation in which India could be used as a Asian hedge against the potential of a hostile Chinese regime.

Looks like Hawaii has been moved without my knowledge, but the map remains accurate despite this geographical anomaly.

Telegraph (Calcutta): Trained in India, to fight in Iraq



Ecuador asks Russia for help on Colombia; Venezuela increases border presence
November 7, 2009, 3:54 am
Filed under: Latin America, Russia / Caucacus, War | Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Looks like the increased U.S presence in Colombia is causing South American nations, especially those involved in the ALBA contingency, to continue preparations for a potential U.S proxy-conflict. With Colombia, the U.S now has a visible military presence on every continent, a precedent which is not lost on Morales, Chavez, Correa and others, especially with the recent increase of violence of the northwest border of Venezuela.


Russian F.M Sergei Lavrov and Ecuador President Rafael Correa

Vedomosti: Ecuador Seeks Russian Aid Against U.S. Military Buildup In Colombia

Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa will come to Moscow to discuss weapons supplies, but the Kremlin also expects him to speak about the recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia.

“We need to restore the might of our army,” Correa said about the goal of his visit to Moscow, which he will make together with Defense Minister Javier Ponce.

Ecuador has been alarmed by the decision of Colombia, with which it severed diplomatic relations in March 2008, to allow U.S. troops to use its bases.

The Ecuadorian officials plan to sign the contract, which was initialed last week, for the delivery of two Mi-17 Hip multirole helicopters for its Defense Ministry’s civilian purposes, said a representative of the Russian state arms exporter, Rosoboronexport.

However, Moscow also expects Ecuador to sign other contracts. A source at Russian Technology said Russia could supply six Su-30MK2 Flanker multirole fighters, several helicopters, and air defense systems to Ecuador, which would increase the value of their military cooperation to over $200 million.

In response, Russia expects Ecuador to recognize the independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. A source at the Russian Foreign Ministry said Ecuador had unofficially promised to announce its intention during the president’s visit…

==========

Reuters: Venezuela arrests eight Colombian ‘paramilitaries’

Xinhua News: Venezuela Strengthens Military Presence On Colombian Border



U.S/NATO expands presence in Asia; future Indian-Chinese conflict possible?
October 26, 2009, 9:09 am
Filed under: Central Asia, China / SE Asia, Russia / Caucacus, War | Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

The force of NATO’s operational doctrine of continual expansion and disruption of opposing forces is now extending their presence into Asia. The battles for the favor of India and the so-called “string of pearls” around the eastern coast of China have set the stage for potential future conflicts. Now, with deepening ties to Western power, India represents another potential wedge for the U.S/NATO, bent on establishing strategic positions on the periphery of their two main economic and political rivals–China and Russia. Historical and geographical considerations also compel the Indians in their current position, to adopt a policy of “superalignment” with the West as opposed to “counteralignment”; represented by the Russia, China, Iran and the Bolivarian alignment based around Venezuela.

Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya: Geo-Strategic Chessboard: War Between India and China?

Here is another great article from Rick Rozoff at ‘Stop NATO’. This also discusses U.S/NATO presence in Asia being used as a bulwark against Russia and China in a variety of arenas.

Rick Rozoff: Dangerous Crossroads: U.S. Expands Asian NATO Against China, Russia

Here is an article from Foreign Affairs in 2006 which suggests that the U.S could use preemptive first strikes against the arsenals of Russia and China.

Kier A. Lieber and Daryl G. Press, The Rise of U.S. Nuclear Primacy; Foreign Affairs: March/April 2006.

“For four decades, relations among the major nuclear powers have been shaped by their common vulnerability, a condition known as mutual assured destruction. But with the U.S. arsenal growing rapidly while Russia’s decays and China’s stays small, the era of MAD is ending – and the era of U.S. nuclear primacy has begun.”

“It will probably soon be possible for the United States to destroy the long-range nuclear arsenals of Russia or China with a first strike.”



Turkey-Armenia normalizing relations; U.S and Russian pipeline conflict in periphery
October 21, 2009, 8:08 am
Filed under: Russia / Caucacus, War | Tags: , , , , , ,

This is an extremely interesting article from the Hindu regarding the potential normalization of Turkish-Armenian relations and what that could mean for Russia and the United States– specifically of note is the discussion of pipeline deals that are contingent on Turkish, Armenian and Azeri participation.

Vladimir Radyuhin: New security configuration in the Caucasus

…Both Russia and the U.S. are interested in the Turkey-Armenia settlement. Russian business, which effectively controls the economy of Armenia, will benefit from the opening of the Turkish border with Armenia, as Russia is also the biggest trading partner of Turkey. In another gain for Russia, the role of its foe Georgia as the main transit route for Armenian trade will greatly diminish once Turkey opens up its border. Russia has already reaped the first benefits on the energy front. Within days of the Turkey-Armenian agreement, its gas monopoly Gazprom signed a contract with Azerbaijan’s state energy company SOCAR on Azerbaijani gas supply to Russia. The deal came as Baku denounced the Turkey-Armenian pact as running “completely against the national interests of Azerbaijan,” because it was concluded without a resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh problem. It is for the first time that Azerbaijan will sell its gas to Russia, which could undermine the West’s plan to build the Nabucco pipeline to ship Caspian and Central Asian gas to Europe bypassing Russia…